The uncertainty layer
for trustworthy AI science

A multi-agent virtual lab that fits GP surrogates, quantifies uncertainty with coverage-audited intervals, and draws the line where a model stops being valid. Other tools ask did it reproduce? β€” SwarmLabs answers how confident, and where does it break?

52+
Experiment scenarios
69
Strain database
100%
GP convergence
44
Capability coverage

Core capabilities

Four pillars of the virtual acceleration lab

πŸ”¬

Physics-model prediction

Engines built on the Arrhenius equation and reaction kinetics β€” no random-number generation. Each is calibrated against published benchmark values: 161 stored calibration points across 82 validated scenarios, ~5% calibration error, and 0 of 82 have experimental ground truth yet (stated on the facts table).

πŸ€–

Multi-agent collaboration

Eight specialized Bee Agents share knowledge through a blackboard pattern, covering literature search, hypothesis generation, experiment design, analysis, and peer review.

πŸ“š

DOI traceability

Connected to Crossref / PubMed / arXiv. Every prediction traces back to its source paper β€” transparent and auditable.

⚑

Bayesian optimization

AI searches for optimal experiment parameters with physics-guided grid search and local refinement, converging to the global optimum within 100 iterations.

πŸ›‘οΈ

Math-backed verification

Not a rubric score or an audit trail. Every claim carries a computed number: coverage against nominal, or an explicit pass / controlled / reject boundary. 18 literature benchmarks β€” including the 7 in the red zone β€” are published, not filtered.

See every claim verified →
πŸ“„

Automated reports

Generates standard research reports from results and validation data, with abstract, methods, results, and data-availability statements.

Browse the V&V report library →

Why not just use a general-purpose AI?

What SwarmLabs delivers that Claude, ChatGPT and other general AIs cannot

πŸ›‘οΈ

V&V credibility checks

Built on ASME V&V 10-2019(R2025) and Sandia's 16 SciML recommendations. Every prediction is scored on fidelity / simplicity / stability / coverage. General AIs cannot offer a physics audit.

🎨

WebGPU visualization

Browser-side molecular-orbital rendering of 10^6 grid points in ~100 ms, benchmarked against MOrbVis (ACS Omega 2026). Zero install, pure web.

πŸ’‘

Explainable AI

SHAP-style parameter attribution with a physical rationale for every recommendation. Explainable Bayesian optimization (XBO) shows *why*, not just *what*.

πŸ”’

Data ownership & compliance

You own your data; we never train on it. Transparent pricing at a fraction of enterprise lab platforms.

πŸ”¬

Domain-engine depth

82 validated scenarios on 57 engine modules across chemistry, energy, materials, biology, separation, analytics, pharma, and electrochemistry β€” each calibrated on published data. General AIs cannot match domain depth.

πŸ“Š

Proprietary data moat

157,836 structured research entities form an experiment parameter–result knowledge graph. Physics from explicit equations and published benchmark values, not statistical guesses from web text.

The 7-step research loop

From literature to report β€” the full research workflow in one place

1
πŸ“–

Literature

Real academic search via Crossref

2
πŸ’‘

Hypotheses

AI generates hypotheses from literature

3
πŸ“

Design

Pick engine & parameters

4
βš—οΈ

Virtual run

Run the physics-model prediction

5
πŸ“Š

Analysis

Uncertainty & confidence assessment

6
πŸ”

Peer review

Eight automated review checks

7
πŸ“„

Report

Standard-format research report

Proof, not promises

Every published claim on this site was re-run through the SwarmLabs virtual-experiment engine. 18 literature benchmarks, 7 in the OOD red zone β€” all published, none filtered. Try the live OOD guard yourself.

Start your virtual experiment

A demo account is ready β€” experience the full loop from literature to report.

πŸš€ Enter the lab