The uncertainty layer
for trustworthy AI science

A multi-agent virtual lab that fits GP surrogates, quantifies uncertainty with coverage-audited intervals, and draws the line where a model stops being valid. Other tools ask did it reproduce? โ€” SwarmLabs answers how confident, and where does it break?

95
ๅฎž้ชŒๅœบๆ™ฏ
10
ๅญฆ็ง‘่ฆ†็›–
19
ๆนฟๅฎž้ชŒๅฎค้”š็‚น
91/3/1
PASS/MARGINAL/REFUTED

Core capabilities

Four pillars of the virtual acceleration lab

๐Ÿ”ฌ

Physics-model prediction

Engines built on the Arrhenius equation and reaction kinetics โ€” no random-number generation. Each is calibrated against published benchmark values: 251 stored calibration points across 95 validated scenarios, ~5% calibration error. Extrapolation stress test: 3 PASS / 6 MARGINAL / 73 REFUTED โ€” the fail-closed gate blocks autonomous action on out-of-domain scenarios.

๐Ÿค–

Multi-agent collaboration

Eight specialized Bee Agents share knowledge through a blackboard pattern, covering literature search, hypothesis generation, experiment design, analysis, and peer review.

๐Ÿ“š

DOI traceability

Connected to Crossref / PubMed / arXiv. Every prediction traces back to its source paper โ€” transparent and auditable.

โšก

Bayesian optimization

AI searches for optimal experiment parameters with physics-guided grid search and local refinement, converging to the global optimum within 100 iterations.

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ

Math-backed verification

Not a rubric score or an audit trail. Every claim carries a computed number: coverage against nominal, or an explicit pass / controlled / reject boundary. 18 literature benchmarks โ€” including the 7 in the red zone โ€” are published, not filtered.

See every claim verified →
๐Ÿ“„

Automated reports

Generates standard research reports from results and validation data, with abstract, methods, results, and data-availability statements.

Browse the V&V report library →

Why not just use a general-purpose AI?

What SwarmLabs delivers that Claude, ChatGPT and other general AIs cannot

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ

V&V credibility checks

Built on ASME V&V 10-2019(R2025) and Sandia's 16 SciML recommendations. Every prediction is scored on fidelity / simplicity / stability / coverage. General AIs cannot offer a physics audit.

๐ŸŽจ

WebGPU visualization

Browser-side molecular-orbital rendering of 10^6 grid points in ~100 ms, benchmarked against MOrbVis (ACS Omega 2026). Zero install, pure web.

๐Ÿ’ก

Explainable AI

SHAP-style parameter attribution with a physical rationale for every recommendation. Explainable Bayesian optimization (XBO) shows *why*, not just *what*.

๐Ÿ”’

Data ownership & compliance

You own your data; we never train on it. Transparent pricing at a fraction of enterprise lab platforms.

๐Ÿ”ฌ

Domain-engine depth

95 validated scenarios (10 disciplines) with calibrated uncertainty intervals (PICPโ‰ฅ0.90), plus 115 engine modules. 73/95 scenarios REFUTED โ€” honestly reported, not hidden. General AIs cannot match domain depth or transparency.

๐Ÿ“Š

Proprietary data moat

157,836 structured research entities form an experiment parameterโ€“result knowledge graph. Physics from explicit equations and published benchmark values, not statistical guesses from web text.

The 7-step research loop

From literature to report โ€” the full research workflow in one place

1
๐Ÿ“–

Literature

Real academic search via Crossref

2
๐Ÿ’ก

Hypotheses

AI generates hypotheses from literature

3
๐Ÿ“

Design

Pick engine & parameters

4
โš—๏ธ

Virtual run

Run the physics-model prediction

5
๐Ÿ“Š

Analysis

Uncertainty & confidence assessment

6
๐Ÿ”

Peer review

Eight automated review checks

7
๐Ÿ“„

Report

Standard-format research report

Proof, not promises

Every published claim on this site was re-run through the SwarmLabs virtual-experiment engine. 18 literature benchmarks, 7 in the OOD red zone โ€” all published, none filtered. Try the live OOD guard yourself.

Start your virtual experiment

A demo account is ready โ€” experience the full loop from literature to report.

๐Ÿš€ Enter the lab